Hi,

Send again with this time to netdev also. I didnt notice Steve not including 
netdev in the first place.

> Hi Francois/Bora,
>
> > > Macro abuse. It should be a function.
> >
> > Yes but I got smc911x.h and smc91x.h as a basis. In the smc911x.c
> > there are macros which is longer than it, e.g. SMC_GET_MII. In the
> > same way, smc91x.h contains even more longer like SMC_PUSH_DATA.
> > But, of course, it doesnt mean they are correct.
>
> At SMSC (with help from ARM) we tidied up and posted our smsc911x driver
> to the netdev list.  This uses a more "2.6" style, supports more devices,
> contains additional workarounds for hardware issues and works on !arm.
>
> I don't think Jeff has included this in 2.6 yet, so let me know if you
> would like a copy.

I tracked your mails from archives. Well, as said, which one will be stay at 
the kernel, Dustin's or SMSC's? Because I have additional patches againist to 
in-kernel driver and maybe some more in the future. Our board is MIPS based.

PS: I am happy if you send me your patches privately...

--
Bora SAHIN
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to