On 03/26/2018 05:04 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:28:03 +0200 > Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> wrote: > >>> tracepoint base kprobe+bpf tracepoint+bpf raw_tracepoint+bpf >>> task_rename 1.1M 769K 947K 1.0M >>> urandom_read 789K 697K 750K 755K >> >> Applied to bpf-next, thanks Alexei! > > Please wait till you have the proper acks. Some of this affects > tracing.
Ok, I thought time up to v5 was long enough. Anyway, in case there are objections I can still toss out the series from bpf-next tree worst case should e.g. follow-up fixups not be appropriate. Thanks, Daniel
