Hi,

rds_tcp_dev_event() is the last user of NETDEV_UNREGISTER_FINAL stage.
If we rework it, we'll be able to kill the stage, and this will decrease
the number of rtnl_lock() we take during generic net device unregistration.
This is very hot path for namespaces.

467fa15356acf by Sowmini Varadhan added NETDEV_UNREGISTER_FINAL dependence
with the commentary:

        /* rds-tcp registers as a pernet subys, so the ->exit will only
         * get invoked after network acitivity has quiesced. We need to
         * clean up all sockets  to quiesce network activity, and use
         * the unregistration of the per-net loopback device as a trigger
         * to start that cleanup.
         */

It seems all the protocols pernet subsystems meet this situation, but they
solve it in generic way. What does rds so specific have?

This commit makes event handler to iterate rds_tcp_conn_list and
kill them. If we change the stage to NETDEV_UNREGISTER, what will change?
Can unregistered loopback device on dead net add new items to rds_tcp_conn_list?
How it's possible?

What the problem is to move rds_tcp_kill_sock() into pernet subsys exit?

Kirill
---
 net/rds/tcp.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/rds/tcp.c b/net/rds/tcp.c
index eb04e7fa2467..4c6db9cb6261 100644
--- a/net/rds/tcp.c
+++ b/net/rds/tcp.c
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ static int rds_tcp_dev_event(struct notifier_block *this,
         * the unregistration of the per-net loopback device as a trigger
         * to start that cleanup.
         */
-       if (event == NETDEV_UNREGISTER_FINAL &&
+       if (event == NETDEV_UNREGISTER &&
            dev->ifindex == LOOPBACK_IFINDEX)
                rds_tcp_kill_sock(dev_net(dev));
 

Reply via email to