On 03/14/2018 06:53 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> syzbot reported one use-after-free in pfifo_fast_enqueue() [1]
> 
> Issue here is that we can not reuse skb after a successful skb_array_produce()
> since another cpu might have consumed it already.
> 
> I believe a similar problem exists in try_bulk_dequeue_skb_slow()
> in case we put an skb into qdisc_enqueue_skb_bad_txq() for lockless qdisc.
> 

[...]

> Fixes: c5ad119fb6c0 ("net: sched: pfifo_fast use skb_array")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: [email protected]
> Cc: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <[email protected]>
> Cc:   Cong Wang <[email protected]>
> Cc:   Jiri Pirko <[email protected]>
> ---
>  net/sched/sch_generic.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 

Thanks!

Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]>

> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> index 
> 190570f21b208d5a17943360a3a6f85e1c2a2187..7e3fbe9cc936be376b66a5b12bf8957c3b601f2c
>  100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> @@ -106,6 +106,14 @@ static inline void qdisc_enqueue_skb_bad_txq(struct 
> Qdisc *q,
>  
>       __skb_queue_tail(&q->skb_bad_txq, skb);
>  
> +     if (qdisc_is_percpu_stats(q)) {
> +             qdisc_qstats_cpu_backlog_inc(q, skb);

So I guess the skb access above needs to be removed as
well per your comment in the commit description. But that
can be another patch.

> +             qdisc_qstats_cpu_qlen_inc(q);
> +     } else {
> +             qdisc_qstats_backlog_inc(q, skb);
> +             q->q.qlen++;
> +     }
> +
>       if (lock)
>               spin_unlock(lock);
>  }


Reply via email to