On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Stefano Brivio <sbri...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 09:40:44 +0200
> Andreas Christoforou <andreaschrist...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c
>> index b15075a..270a53a 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c
>> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ __xfrm6_sort(void **dst, void **src, int n, int 
>> (*cmp)(void *p), int maxclass)
>>  {
>>       int i;
>>       int class[XFRM_MAX_DEPTH];
>> -     int count[maxclass];
>> +     int count[XFRM_MAX_DEPTH];
>>
>>       memset(count, 0, sizeof(count));
>
> Can you perhaps initialize 'count' instead of calling memset(), now?

Do you mean:

int count[XFRM_MAX_DEPTH] = { };

instead of the memset()?

I thought the compiler would resolve these both to the same thing? The
former looks better though! :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Reply via email to