On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:18:31 +0200 Daniele Lacamera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 September 2006 05:41, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Pacing in itself isn't a bad idea, but: > <cut> > > * Since it is most useful over long delay links, maybe it should be a > route parameter. > Look into rtnetlink and how we keep track of route metrics, and add a new per route state variable. Need to update iproute2 (ip command) as well. > What does this mean? Should I move the sysctl switch elsewhere? > > A new (cleaner) patch follows. > Thanks to you all for your attention & advices. > > Signed-off by: Daniele Lacamera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You may also want into look into high resolution timer (hrtimer), the resolution doesn't get finer than HZ without using -rt patches. But the ktime interface is cleaner than the normal timer math. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
