On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 07:27:05AM +0000, Sargun Dhillon wrote: > +config SECCOMP_FILTER_EXTENDED > + bool "Extended BPF seccomp filters" > + depends on SECCOMP_FILTER && BPF_SYSCALL > + depends on !CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
Why not just give -EINVAL or something in case one of these is requested, instead of making them incompatible at compile time? Tycho
