From: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:13:24 -0700
> On 2/26/18 12:08 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> >> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 11:47:12 -0800 >> >>> A later patch removes rt6i_table from rt6_info. Save the ipv6 >>> table for a VRF in net_vrf. fib tables can not be deleted so >>> no reference counting or locking is required. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> >> >> Is this change really OK all by itself? > > should. When you look at references to rt6i_table the only one for the > data path is changing sernum when inserting an exception. Exceptions are > not relevant for this special VRF dst as it is used for an internal > redirection before packets leave the box. ... > But if you want me to be extra cautious I can leave the rt6i_table > setting and remove it in patch 20 (remove unneeded rt6_info elements). No, it's not necessary if it is really an isolated object like this.
