From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com> The original code that implemented this accidentally had an inverted check, so it would never show the VF number properly.
Fix this code to correctly display the VF number when we have one. Fixes: 36ee712b0fbc ("ethtool: support queue and VF fields for rxclass filters", 2017-03-23) Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com> Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bow...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com> --- rxclass.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/rxclass.c b/rxclass.c index ebc3e1a..144c8e5 100644 --- a/rxclass.c +++ b/rxclass.c @@ -252,11 +252,11 @@ static void rxclass_print_nfc_rule(struct ethtool_rx_flow_spec *fsp) u64 queue = ethtool_get_flow_spec_ring(fsp->ring_cookie); if (vf) - fprintf(stdout, "\tAction: Direct to queue %llu\n", - queue); - else fprintf(stdout, "\tAction: Direct to VF %llu queue %llu\n", vf, queue); + else + fprintf(stdout, "\tAction: Direct to queue %llu\n", + queue); } else { fprintf(stdout, "\tAction: Drop\n"); } -- 2.14.3