On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 11:17:36AM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallwe...@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 07:21:32 +0100 > > > Recently ethtool started to give incomplete values for supported and > > advertised modes. There seems to be a regression in this commit: > > The bit number parameter in the calls to bitmap_to_arr32() in > > store_link_ksettings_for_user() should be __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS > > instead of __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NU32. > > > > After having changed this ethtool behaves normally again. > > I do not see the commit with the SHA1 ID from the Subject line in > either Linus's nor my networking tree. > > Where is that change?
It's in next-20180202. Yury
