Hi, On Sat, 2018-01-27 at 18:27 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > If clang >= 4.0.1 is missing the option '-target bpf', it will cause > llc/llvm to create two ELF sections for "Exception Frames", with > section names '.eh_frame' and '.rel.eh_frame'. > > The BPF ELF loader library libbpf fails when loading files with these > sections. The other in-kernel BPF ELF loader in > samples/bpf/bpf_load.c, > handle this gracefully. And iproute2 loader also seems to work with > these > "eh" sections. > > The issue in libbpf is caused by bpf_object__elf_collect() skip the > '.eh_frame' and thus doesn't create an internal data structure > pointing to this ELF section index. Later when the relocation > section > '.rel.eh_frame' is processed, it tries to find the '.eh_frame' via > the > ELF section idx, which is that fails (in bpf_object__collect_reloc). > > I couldn't find a way to see that the '.rel.eh_frame' was irrelevant > (that is only determined by looking at the section it reference, > which > we no longer have info available on). > > Thus, my solution is simply to match on the name of the relocation > section, to skip that too.
I confirm this fixes the issue I have seen when loading XDP filter with libbpf in Suricata. BR, -- Eric Leblond <e...@regit.org> Blog: https://home.regit.org/