On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 16:42 +0200, Tal Gilboa wrote: > Hi Eric, > My choice of words in my comment was misplaced, and I apologies. It > completely missed the point. I understand, of course, the importance of > optimizing real-life scenarios. > > We are currently evaluating this patch and if/how it might affect our > customers. We would also evaluate your suggestion below. > > We will contact you if and when we have a real concern. > Thanks.
Sure, I am curious how a 50% regression can be possible as a matter of fact, so please update even if this caused by some specific synthetic test conditions. Thanks.
