On 01/24/2018 02:30 AM, Lawrence Brakmo wrote: > On 1/23/18, 5:11 PM, "Daniel Borkmann" <dan...@iogearbox.net> wrote: [...] > > +{ > > + return -EPERM; > > +} > > + > > +static inline int tcp_call_bpf_4arg(struct sock *sk, int op, u32 arg1, > u32 arg2, > > + u32 arg3, u32 arg4) > > +{ > > + return -EPERM; > > +} > > + > > #endif > > tcp_call_bpf_1arg() and tcp_call_bpf_4arg() unused for the time being? > > Yes, I just thought I should add them for completeness. Should I remove them > until > they are actually used?
Yeah, I think that would be preferred way. Thanks again, Daniel