On 01/23/2018 01:31 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 12:58 +0100, Ursula Braun wrote:
>>
>> On 01/19/2018 09:54 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>> Return statements in functions returning bool should use
>>> true/false instead of 1/0.
>>>
>>> This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>>  - Fix function using_ipsec as suggested by Ursula Braun.
>>>  - Update subject line.
>>>
>>>  net/smc/smc.h | 4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/smc/smc.h b/net/smc/smc.h
> []
>>> @@ -253,12 +253,12 @@ static inline int smc_uncompress_bufsize(u8 
>>> compressed)
>>>  static inline bool using_ipsec(struct smc_sock *smc)
>>>  {
>>>     return (smc->clcsock->sk->sk_policy[0] ||
>>> -           smc->clcsock->sk->sk_policy[1]) ? 1 : 0;
>>> +           smc->clcsock->sk->sk_policy[1]) ? true : false;
> 
> Generally, any bool return like
> 
>       return condition ? true : false;
> 
> could be written
> 
>       return condition;
> 
This would be shorter, but is it really better readable/understandable?
Do you have a reference for us confirming your proposed style is the way to go?

Reply via email to