On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:57:01PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Since some time (didn't bisect it yet) I get the following warning.
> Is it a known issue?
[...]
> [86220.126999] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> mm/slab.h:420
> [86220.127041] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1003, name:
> kworker/0:2
> [86220.127082] 4 locks held by kworker/0:2/1003:
> [86220.127107] #0: ((wq_completion)"%s"("ipv6_addrconf")){+.+.}, at:
> [<00000000da8e9b73>] process_one_work+0x1de/0x680
> [86220.127179] #1: ((addr_chk_work).work){+.+.}, at: [<00000000da8e9b73>]
> process_one_work+0x1de/0x680
> [86220.127242] #2: (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<00000000b06d9510>]
> rtnl_lock+0x12/0x20
> [86220.127300] #3: (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}, at: [<00000000aef52299>]
> addrconf_verify_rtnl+0x1e/0x510 [ipv6]
> [86220.127414] CPU: 0 PID: 1003 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted
> 4.15.0-rc7-next-20180110+ #7
> [86220.127463] Hardware name: ZOTAC ZBOX-CI321NANO/ZBOX-CI321NANO, BIOS
> B246P105 06/01/2015
> [86220.127528] Workqueue: ipv6_addrconf addrconf_verify_work [ipv6]
> [86220.127568] Call Trace:
> [86220.127591] dump_stack+0x70/0x9e
> [86220.127616] ___might_sleep+0x14d/0x240
> [86220.127644] __might_sleep+0x45/0x80
> [86220.127672] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x53/0x250
> [86220.127717] ? ipv6_add_addr+0xfe/0x6e0 [ipv6]
> [86220.127762] ipv6_add_addr+0xfe/0x6e0 [ipv6]
> [86220.127807] ipv6_create_tempaddr+0x24d/0x430 [ipv6]
> [86220.127854] ? ipv6_create_tempaddr+0x24d/0x430 [ipv6]
> [86220.127903] addrconf_verify_rtnl+0x339/0x510 [ipv6]
> [86220.127950] ? addrconf_verify_rtnl+0x339/0x510 [ipv6]
> [86220.127998] addrconf_verify_work+0xe/0x20 [ipv6]
> [86220.128032] process_one_work+0x258/0x680
> [86220.128063] worker_thread+0x35/0x3f0
> [86220.128091] kthread+0x124/0x140
> [86220.128117] ? process_one_work+0x680/0x680
> [86220.128146] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40
> [86220.128180] ? umh_complete+0x40/0x40
> [86220.128207] ? call_usermodehelper_exec_async+0x12a/0x160
> [86220.128243] ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x60
Can you please try attached patch (untested)?
>From 70e4bc2a8fe08fb30251f786990a91d3ed2232e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 15:29:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ipv6: Do not sleep in RCU read-side critical section
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]>
---
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index ab99cb641b7c..9ad1365c91ca 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -4356,7 +4356,8 @@ static void addrconf_verify_rtnl(void)
spin_lock(&ifpub->lock);
ifpub->regen_count = 0;
spin_unlock(&ifpub->lock);
- ipv6_create_tempaddr(ifpub,
ifp, true);
+ ipv6_create_tempaddr(ifpub, ifp,
+ false);
in6_ifa_put(ifpub);
in6_ifa_put(ifp);
goto restart;
--
2.14.3
