I'm not entirely sure what happens in the case of a valid port,
at best it'll be silently ignored. This patch ignores them a little
more verbosely.
Signed-Off-By: Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c 2006-09-01 19:06:42.000000000
+0900
+++ linux-2.6/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c 2006-09-01 19:08:19.000000000 +0900
@@ -373,6 +373,12 @@
for (i=0; i<IP_VS_APP_MAX_PORTS; i++) {
if (!ports[i])
continue;
+ if (ports[i] < 0 || ports[i] > 0xffff) {
+ IP_VS_WARNING("ip_vs_ftp: Ignoring invalid "
+ "configuration port[%d] = %d\n",
+ i, ports[i]);
+ continue;
+ }
ret = register_ip_vs_app_inc(app, app->protocol, ports[i]);
if (ret)
break;
--
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
