On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >> Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 09:48:54PM CET, dsah...@gmail.com wrote: >>>On 1/15/18 11:18 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote: >>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/forwarding/lib.sh >>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/forwarding/lib.sh >>>> index bb423371f4de..264bf0af4c4d 100644 >>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/forwarding/lib.sh >>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/forwarding/lib.sh >>>> @@ -22,6 +22,11 @@ if [[ ! -x "$(command -v jq)" ]]; then >>>> exit 0 >>>> fi >>>> >>>> +if [[ ! -x "$(command -v mausezahn)" ]]; then >>>> + echo "SKIP: mausezahn not installed" >>>> + exit 0 >>>> +fi >>>> + >>> >>>The checks are good, but hitting a collision with this one: >>>$ ./router.sh >>>SKIP: mausezahn not installed >>> >>>For debian, it is mz not mausezahn. >> >> That is weird. If you look at the sources, the binary name is >> "mausezahn". Looks like debian is doing some renaming :/ >> > > I have seen/used both versions. Debian packages from some old upstream > source which calls it mz. > https://packages.debian.org/sid/main/mz > > I have used latest mz (with ipv6 support etc) from netsniff-ng which > builds it as mausezahn.
actually Debian also builds https://packages.debian.org/sid/netsniff-ng and installs 'mausezahn' so you might have to check and use which exists... (mausezahn overriding mz).
