On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Pravin Shelar <pshe...@ovn.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:27 AM, Jiri Benc <jb...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 08:34:14 -0800, William Tu wrote: >>> I'd also prefer reverting ceaa001a170e since it's more clean but I >>> also hope to have this feature in 4.15. >>> How long does reverting take? Am I only able to submit the new patch >>> after the reverting is merged? Or I can submit revert and this new >>> patch in one series? I have little experience in reverting, can you >>> suggest which way is better? >> >> Send the revert for net (subject will be "[PATCH net] revert: >> openvswitch: Add erspan tunnel support."). Don't forget to explain why >> you're proposing a revert. >> >> After it is accepted and applied to net.git, wait until the patch >> appears in net-next.git. It may take a little while. After that, send >> the new patch(es) for net-next. >> > > I agree, Once we have the V2 interface, this current ERSAN interface > unlikely to be used by any one, so it would be nice to get rid of the > old interface while we can.
Thanks Jiri and Pravin. I will send out revert patch request. William
