On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 08:29:31PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 1/4/18 12:01 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > diff --git a/rdma/utils.c b/rdma/utils.c
> > index af2b374d..446c23da 100644
> > --- a/rdma/utils.c
> > +++ b/rdma/utils.c
> > @@ -114,6 +114,225 @@ static void dev_map_cleanup(struct rd *rd)
> >     }
> >  }
> >
> > +static int add_filter(struct rd *rd, char *key, char *value,
> > +                 const char * const valid_filters[])
> > +{
> > +   char cset[] = "1234567890,-";
> > +   struct filter_entry *fe;
> > +   bool key_found = false;
> > +   int idx = 0;
> > +   int ret;
> > +
> > +   fe = calloc(1, sizeof(*fe));
> > +   if (!fe)
> > +           return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +   while (valid_filters[idx]) {
> > +           if (!strcmpx(key, valid_filters[idx])) {
> > +                   key_found = true;
> > +                   break;
> > +           }
> > +           idx++;
> > +   }
> > +   if (!key_found) {
> > +           pr_err("Unsupported filter option: %s\n", key);
> > +           ret = -EINVAL;
> > +           goto err;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   /*
> > +    * Check the filter validity, not optimal, but works
> > +    *
> > +    * Actually, there are three types of filters
> > +    *  numeric - for example PID or QPN
> > +    *  string  - for example states, currently only "display"
> > +    *            is from this type
> > +    *  link    - user requested to filter on specific link
> > +    *            e.g. mlx5_1/1, mlx5_1/-, mlx5_1 ...
> > +    */
> > +   if (strcmpx(key, "link") && strcmpx(key, "display") &&
> > +       strspn(value, cset) != strlen(value)) {
> > +           pr_err("%s filter accepts \"%s\" characters only\n", key, cset);
> > +           ret = -EINVAL;
> > +           goto err;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   fe->key = strdup(key);
> > +   fe->value = strdup(value);
> > +
>
> Missed this the other day. 2 more strdup's that should be checked.

Thanks, David,

I'll fix and send new version once the RDMA kernel part will be accepted.

Thanks

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to