On 1/6/18 11:02 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > BTW: From your output, DavidA, i noticed something strange: > two flower filters with the same handle id 0x1 (different prios) > and also two filters with the same prio (but different handles). > I see one was added using :dev .." - how were the other 2 added? > Consequence of patch, maybe?
Not clear from the command history. I was running commands (add by device and add by block) in various orders to see what happens. > > Note: > Expected behavior is two filters of same kind on the same chain > should be distinguished by priority. There are filters like u32 > (which hide hash tables under the same priority) which may > allow the same prio for multiple handles - just dont see that > fit with flower, but maybe missing something. > > cheers, > jamal
