From: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil.k...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed,  3 Jan 2018 21:47:10 -0500

> From: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soh...@google.com>
> 
> We should only record RPS on normal reads and writes.
> In single threaded processes, all calls record the same state. In
> multi-threaded processes where a separate thread processes
> errors, the RFS table mispredicts.
> 
> Note that, when CONFIG_RPS is disabled, sock_rps_record_flow
> is a noop and no branch is added as a result of this patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soh...@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <will...@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardw...@google.com>

Applied.

Reply via email to