On 1/2/18 7:55 PM, Chris Mi wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/libnetlink.c b/lib/libnetlink.c
> index 00e6ce0c..cc02a139 100644
> --- a/lib/libnetlink.c
> +++ b/lib/libnetlink.c
> @@ -581,32 +581,34 @@ static void rtnl_talk_error(struct nlmsghdr *h, struct 
> nlmsgerr *err,
>               strerror(-err->error));
>  }
>  
> -static int __rtnl_talk(struct rtnl_handle *rtnl, struct nlmsghdr *n,
> -                    struct nlmsghdr **answer,
> -                    bool show_rtnl_err, nl_ext_ack_fn_t errfn)
> +static int __rtnl_talk_msg(struct rtnl_handle *rtnl, struct msghdr *m,
> +                        struct nlmsghdr **answer,
> +                        bool show_rtnl_err, nl_ext_ack_fn_t errfn)
>  {
> -     int status;
> -     unsigned int seq;
> -     struct nlmsghdr *h;
> +     int iovlen = m->msg_iovlen;
> +     unsigned int seq = 0;
> +     int i, status;
> +     char *buf;
> +
>       struct sockaddr_nl nladdr = { .nl_family = AF_NETLINK };
> -     struct iovec iov = {
> -             .iov_base = n,
> -             .iov_len = n->nlmsg_len
> -     };
> +     struct iovec iov, *v;
> +     struct nlmsghdr *h;
>       struct msghdr msg = {
>               .msg_name = &nladdr,
>               .msg_namelen = sizeof(nladdr),
>               .msg_iov = &iov,
>               .msg_iovlen = 1,
>       };
> -     char *buf;

Reverse xmas tree is the coding standard for net code. Please adhere to
it. Only dependencies between variables are an acceptable exception.

Some of those (struct nlmsghdr *h and struct iovec *v) can be moved to
the for loop which aligns with your intentions of grouping variables.

>  
> -     n->nlmsg_seq = seq = ++rtnl->seq;
> -
> -     if (answer == NULL)
> -             n->nlmsg_flags |= NLM_F_ACK;
> +     for (i = 0; i < iovlen; i++) {
> +             v = &m->msg_iov[i];
> +             h = v->iov_base;
> +             h->nlmsg_seq = seq = ++rtnl->seq;

doesn't seq need to track the recvmsg loop? I think for batching you
want it to start at the first seq number and then in the recvmsg loop
increment it.

As it stands this file:
$ cat tc.batch
filter add dev eth2 ingress protocol ip pref 21 flower dst_ip
192.168.1.0/16 action drop
filter add dev eth2 ingress protocol ip pref 22 flower dst_ip
192.168.2.0/16 action drop
filter add dev eth2 ingress protocol ip pref 22 flower dst_ip
192.168.3.0/16 action drop
filter add dev eth2 ingress protocol ip pref 24 flower dst_ip
192.168.4.0/16 action drop
filter add dev eth2 ingress protocol ip pref 25 flower dst_ip
192.168.5.0/16 action drop

does not give me an error message:
$ tc -b tc.batch -bs 5
<no output>

Yet it failed to insert all filters:
$ tc filter show dev eth2 ingress
filter protocol ip pref 21 flower chain 0
filter protocol ip pref 21 flower chain 0 handle 0x1
  eth_type ipv4
  dst_ip 192.168.1.0/16
  not_in_hw
        action order 1: gact action drop
         random type none pass val 0
         index 1 ref 1 bind 1

filter protocol ip pref 22 flower chain 0
filter protocol ip pref 22 flower chain 0 handle 0x1
  eth_type ipv4
  dst_ip 192.168.2.0/16
  not_in_hw
        action order 1: gact action drop
         random type none pass val 0
         index 2 ref 1 bind 1

filter protocol ip pref 24 flower chain 0
filter protocol ip pref 24 flower chain 0 handle 0x1
  eth_type ipv4
  dst_ip 192.168.4.0/16
  not_in_hw
        action order 1: gact action drop
         random type none pass val 0
         index 3 ref 1 bind 1

filter protocol ip pref 25 flower chain 0
filter protocol ip pref 25 flower chain 0 handle 0x1
  eth_type ipv4
  dst_ip 192.168.5.0/16
  not_in_hw
        action order 1: gact action drop
         random type none pass val 0
         index 4 ref 1 bind 1

Reply via email to