Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 08:57:35AM CET, j...@resnulli.us wrote:
>From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>
>
>When we remove the neighbour associated with a nexthop we should always
>refuse to write the nexthop to the adjacency table. Regardless if it is
>already present in the table or not.
>
>Otherwise, we risk dereferencing the NULL pointer that was set instead
>of the neighbour.
>
>Fixes: a7ff87acd995 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Implement next-hop routing")
>Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>
>Reported-by: Alexander Petrovskiy <ale...@mellanox.com>
>Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>Dave, could you please queue this up for 4.14.y together with "mlxsw: spectrum: Relax sanity checks during enslavement". Thanks!
