> Of course! v2 will not have such problem, I've been waiting however
> for the feedback about the ACPI representation. Anyway, I'm strongly
> leaning towards using _ADR/_CID objects in PHY's nodes for ACPI, so
> maybe I'll just issue the v2 in order to push the discussion a bit
> forward.
Hi Marcin
I know ~0 about ACPI. But what seems to be missing for me is
documentation. You are defining a ABI here, which all future MDIO
busses, PHYs, and to some extent Ethernet switches need to follow. So
i would expect this to be documented somewhere.
How does documentation work in the ACPI world?
Andrew
