On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:58:25 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org> wrote:

> +TRACE_EVENT(sctp_probe,
> +
> +     TP_PROTO(const struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
> +              const struct sctp_association *asoc,
> +              struct sctp_chunk *chunk),
> +
> +     TP_ARGS(ep, asoc, chunk),
> +
> +     TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +             __field(__u64, asoc)
> +             __field(__u32, mark)
> +             __field(__u16, bind_port)
> +             __field(__u16, peer_port)
> +             __field(__u32, pathmtu)
> +             __field(__u32, rwnd)
> +             __field(__u16, unack_data)
> +     ),
> +
> +     TP_fast_assign(
> +             struct sctp_transport *sp;
> +             struct sk_buff *skb = chunk->skb;
> +
> +             __entry->asoc = (__u64)asoc;
> +             __entry->mark = skb->mark;
> +             __entry->bind_port = ep->base.bind_addr.port;
> +             __entry->peer_port = asoc->peer.port;
> +             __entry->pathmtu = asoc->pathmtu;
> +             __entry->rwnd = asoc->peer.rwnd;
> +             __entry->unack_data = asoc->unack_data;
> +
> +             if (trace_sctp_probe_path_enabled()) {
> +                     list_for_each_entry(sp, &asoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
> +                                         transports) {
> +                             trace_sctp_probe_path(sp, asoc);
> +                     }
> +             }

I thought you were going to move this into the code, like I suggested?

-- Steve

> +     ),
> +
> +     TP_printk("asoc=%#llx mark=%#x bind_port=%d peer_port=%d pathmtu=%d "
> +               "rwnd=%u unack_data=%d",
> +               __entry->asoc, __entry->mark, __entry->bind_port,
> +               __entry->peer_port, __entry->pathmtu, __entry->rwnd,
> +               __entry->unack_data)
> +);
> +

Reply via email to