On Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017 11:57:55 CET Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > No, this is also bad because batman_adv.h is MIT license and packet.h is > > GPL-2. So what other name would you suggest for packet.h? > > batman_adv_packet.h? > > Sure, that sounds great. Thanks.
Really? Isn't include/uapi/linux/batman_adv_packet.h looking like an accident
which never should have had happened?
Kind regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
