On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:40:08 -0800 Daniel Lakeland <dlake...@street-artists.org> wrote:
> This same problem as detailed here > > http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2010/03/26/36 This mail reports an issue from 7 years ago, much nas changed since then. > > or here: > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/lartc/msg22541.html > > bit me today > > I tried either > > ip rule add dsfield CS6 table 100 > > or > > ip rule add dsfield 0xc0 table 100 > > or replace dsfield with tos, all return: > > RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument > > on the other hand, for ip route it will accept the ds/tos values > > ip route add default dsfield CS6 dev dummy0 > > or > > ip route add default dsfield 0xc0 dev dummy0 > > but packets tagged with CS6 don't go to dummy0 they go the regular > default route > > The kernel is complaining that ip rule is not valid, (ie not iproute2 issue). Not sure exactly why or where in fib_rules.c this is happening.
