On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:25:51PM -0800, Scott Branden wrote: > Hi Paul, > > > On 17-12-04 01:00 PM, Greenwalt, Paul wrote: > > John, > > > > Can this patch be reverted? As Stephen Hemminger mentioned > > there is an ABI compatibility issue with this patch: > I can add the revert into a patch series followed by the sync of > ethtool-copy.h with net-netx ethtool.h
Yes, exactly. I see that you did just that in your later series submission. Thanks! John > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/806049/#1757846 > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Scott Branden [mailto:scott.bran...@broadcom.com] > > > Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 12:07 PM > > > To: linvi...@tuxdriver.com; Greenwalt, Paul <paul.greenw...@intel.com> > > > Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org> > > > Subject: ethtool-copy.h out of sync with linux header file? > > > > > > Hi Paul/John, > > > > > > I see a commit "ethtool: Add DMA Coalescing support" was added to > > > ethtool-copy.h yet I cannot find the change in the ethtool.h in the > > > linux kernel. > > > > > > As such, I am unable to commit a change to ethtool-copy.h to sync it > > > with net-next. If I sync then ethtool will fail to compile. > > > > > > Please advise. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linvi...@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
