Incorrect/missing annotations caused a few sparse warnings: rtnetlink.c:155:15: incompatible types .. (different address spaces) rtnetlink.c:157:23: incompatible types .. (different address spaces) rtnetlink.c:185:15: incompatible types .. (different address spaces) rtnetlink.c:285:15: incompatible types .. (different address spaces) rtnetlink.c:317:9: incompatible types .. (different address spaces) rtnetlink.c:3054:23: incompatible types .. (different address spaces)
no change in generated code. Fixes: addf9b90de22f7 ("net: rtnetlink: use rcu to free rtnl message handlers") Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de> --- diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c index 642b3afb12b9..a4faefd65006 100644 --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ bool lockdep_rtnl_is_held(void) EXPORT_SYMBOL(lockdep_rtnl_is_held); #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING */ -static struct rtnl_link __rcu **rtnl_msg_handlers[RTNL_FAMILY_MAX + 1]; +static struct rtnl_link *__rcu *rtnl_msg_handlers[RTNL_FAMILY_MAX + 1]; static inline int rtm_msgindex(int msgtype) { @@ -164,7 +164,8 @@ static int rtnl_register_internal(struct module *owner, rtnl_doit_func doit, rtnl_dumpit_func dumpit, unsigned int flags) { - struct rtnl_link **tab, *link, *old; + struct rtnl_link *link, *old; + struct rtnl_link __rcu **tab; int msgindex; int ret = -ENOBUFS; -- 2.13.6