On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 09:50:12AM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> When the 'ignore_routes_with_linkdown' sysctl is set, we should not
> consider linkdown nexthops during route lookup.
> 
> While the code correctly verifies that the initially selected route
> ('match') has a carrier, it does not perform the same check in the
> subsequent multipath selection, resulting in a potential packet loss.
> 
> In case the chosen route does not have a carrier and the sysctl is set,
> choose the initially selected route.
> 
> Fixes: 35103d11173b ("net: ipv6 sysctl option to ignore routes when nexthop 
> link is down")
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>

Nice find.  Looks good to me, as well.

Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <a...@greyhouse.net>

> ---
>  net/ipv6/route.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index 05eb7bc36156..0363db914c7a 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -472,6 +472,11 @@ static struct rt6_info *rt6_multipath_select(struct 
> rt6_info *match,
>                               &match->rt6i_siblings, rt6i_siblings) {
>                       route_choosen--;
>                       if (route_choosen == 0) {
> +                             struct inet6_dev *idev = sibling->rt6i_idev;
> +
> +                             if (!netif_carrier_ok(sibling->dst.dev) &&
> +                                 idev->cnf.ignore_routes_with_linkdown)
> +                                     break;
>                               if (rt6_score_route(sibling, oif, strict) < 0)
>                                       break;
>                               match = sibling;
> -- 
> 2.14.3
> 

Reply via email to