On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:55:32 +0900 (KST) David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Ahmed Abdelsalam <amsala...@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:31:48 +0100 > > > Also it will not make sense to have the field name differnent from the > > draft. > > That is the danger of defining user facing things against a draft which > is constantly changing. > I totally understand your point of keeping the user API unchanged. > Sorry, we are stuck with the current name. For the time being, Can i submit another patch updating the "reserved" bits to be "tag" and just adding a comment next the "first_segment". In the comment we can mention that this represent the "last_entry" field of the Segment Routing Header (SRH). -- Ahmed
