On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 03:22:04PM +0100, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> On 14/11/2017 14:02, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
> > Missing patch description. Don't bother though. I won't approve of
> > this implementation.
>
> I hope I can convince David that you should not have veto power over
> this driver just because it was you who submitted it upstream first.
In practice, anybody can request a veto on a patch. If a patch
introduces a regression, and somebody reports it, that is pretty much
an automatic veto.
Please work with Mans to ensure you are not breaking the driver for
the hardware he cares about.
Andrew
