Hi Thomas,

What can be done with some time to work on?

The managed mechanism consists of 3 pieces:

  1) Vector spreading

  2) Managed vector allocation, which becomes a guaranteed reservation in
     4.15 due of the big rework of the vector management code.

     Non managed interrupts get a best effort reservation to handle theCPU
     unplug vector pressure problem in a sane way.

  3) CPU hotplug management

     If the last CPU in the affinity set goes offline, then the interrupt is
     shutdown and restarted when the first CPU in the affinity set comes
     online again. The driver code needs to ensure that the queue associated
     to that interrupt is drained before shutdown and nothing is queued
     there after this point.

So we have options:

1) Initial vector spreading

  Let the driver use the initial vector spreading. That does only the
  initial affinity setup, but otherwise the interrupts are handled like any
  other non managed interrupt, i.e. best effort reservation, affinity
  settings enabled and CPU unplug breaks affinity and moves them to some
  random other online CPU.

  The simplest solution of all.

2) Allowing a driver supplied mask

  Certainly simple to do, but as you said it's not really a solution. I'm
  not sure whether we want to go there as this is going to be replaced fast
  enough and then create another breakage/frustration level.


3) Affinity override in managed mode

  Doable, but there are a couple of things to think about:

I think that it will be good to shoot for (3). Given that there are
driver requirements I'd say that driver will expose up front if it can
handle it, and if not we fallback to (1).

   * How is this enabled?

     - Opt-in by driver
        
     - Extra sysfs/procfs knob

     We definitely should not enable it per default because that would
     surprise users/drivers which work with the current managed devices and
     rely on the affinity files to be non writeable in managed mode.

Do you know if any exist? Would it make sense to have a survey to
understand if anyone relies on it?

From what I've seen so far, drivers that were converted simply worked
with the non-managed facility and didn't have any special code for it.
Perhaps Christoph can comment as he convert most of them.

But if there aren't any drivers that absolutely rely on it, maybe its
not a bad idea to allow it by default?


   * When and how is the driver informed about the change?

      When:

        #1 Before the core tries to move the interrupt so it can veto the
          move if it cannot allocate new resources or whatever is required
          to operate after the move.

What would the core do if a driver veto a move? I'm wandering in what
conditions a driver will be unable to allocate resources for move to cpu
X but able to allocate for move to cpu Y.

        
        #2 After the core made the move effective because:

           - The interrupt might be moved from an offline set to an online
             set and needs to be started up, so the related queue must be
             enabled as well.

           - The interrupt might be moved from an online set to an offline
             set, so the queue needs to be drained and disabled.

          - Resources which have been allocated in the first step must be
             made effective and old resources freed.

      How:

        The existing affinity notification mechanism does not work for this
        and it's a horrible piece of crap which should go away sooner than
        later.

        So we need some sensible way to provide callback. Emphasis on
        callbacks as one multiplexing callback is not a good idea.

   * How can the change made effective?

     When the preliminaries (vector reservation on the new set and
     evtl. resource allocation in the subsystem have been done, then the
     actual move can be made.

     But, there is a caveat. x86 is not good in reassociating interrupts on
     the fly except when it sits behind an interrupt remapping unit, but we
     cannot rely on that.

     So the change flow which works for everything would be:

     if (reserve_vectors() < 0)
        return FAIL;

     if (subsys_prep_callback() < 0) {
        release_vectors();
        return FAIL;
     }

     shutdown(irq);

     if (!online(newset))
        return SUCCESS;

     startup(irq);

     subsys_post_callback();
     return SUCCESS;

     subsys_prep_callback() must basically work the same way as the CPU
     offline mechanism and drain the queue and prevent queueing before the
     irq is restarted. If the move results in keeping it shutdown because
     the new set is offline, then the irq will be restarted via the CPU
     hotplug code and the subsystem will be informed about that via the
     hotplug mechanism as well.

     subsys_post_callback() is more or less the same as the hotplug callback
     and restarts the queue. The only difference to the hotplug code as of
     today is that it might need to make previously allocated resources
     effective and free the old ones.

     I named that subsys_*_callback() on purpose because this should be
     handled in a generic way for multiqueue devices and not done at the
     driver level.

   There are some very interesting locking problems to solve, especially
   vs. CPU hotplug, but that should be solvable.

This looks like it can work to me, but I'm probably not familiar enough
to see the full picture here.

Reply via email to