Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:05:26AM CET, jakub.kicin...@netronome.com wrote:
>On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 08:56:58 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 08:54:52AM CET, jakub.kicin...@netronome.com wrote:
>> >On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 16:56:00 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_ingress.c b/net/sched/sch_ingress.c
>> >> index 5ecc38f..ee89efc 100644
>> >> --- a/net/sched/sch_ingress.c
>> >> +++ b/net/sched/sch_ingress.c
>> >> @@ -60,6 +60,29 @@ static void clsact_chain_head_change(struct tcf_proto
>> >> *tp_head, void *priv)
>> >> struct mini_Qdisc_pair *miniqp = priv;
>> >>
>> >> mini_qdisc_pair_swap(miniqp, tp_head);
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const struct nla_policy ingress_policy[TCA_CLSACT_MAX + 1] = {
>> >> + [TCA_CLSACT_INGRESS_BLOCK] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static int ingress_parse_opt(struct nlattr *opt, u32
>> >> *p_ingress_block_index)
>> >
>> >nit: why the p_ prefix on all the pointers?
>>
>> Just to diferenciate:
>> u32 *ingress_block_index
>> and
>> u32 ingress_block_index
>
>But why? There isn't a single ingress_block_index in this patch.
>Looks like Hungarian notation.
Will change that.
