From: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 21:53:27 +0900
> On 2017年11月08日 20:32, David Miller wrote: >> From: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> >> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 17:25:48 +0900 >> >>> On 2017年11月08日 17:08, Willem de Bruijn wrote: >>>> That won't help in the short term. I'm still reading up to see if >>>> there are >>>> any other options besides reimplement or advertise-but-drop, such as >>>> an implicit trigger that would make the guest renegotiate. It's >>>> unlikely, but >>>> worth a look.. >>> Yes, this looks hard. And even if we can manage to do this, it looks >>> an overkill since it will impact all guest after migration. >> Like Willem I would much prefer "advertise-but-drop" if it works. > > This makes migration work but all guest UFO traffic will stall. The idea is that the sender will resend and it will be smaller and thus non-UFO.
