On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That is not in net-next, and the "net" version of that one patch does > not apply to net-next. The relevant thread says "... another fun merge > into net-next". > > Please let me know when the fun is done, and I'll retest.
-net is merged into -net-next now.
