> So if you would like to change the if-statement: It will need a small adjustment for the shown transformation.
I was also unsure if the proposal will work in a single update step. > 1. Send a patch for vxcan.c to improve the error handling flow I am going to send a second approach for this update variant. > 2. Send a separate patch for all rtnl_configure_link() callers to unify the > result check > > Step 2 is optional ... and prepare yourself for more feedback ;-) I am curious on how software development aspects will evolve around desired error predicates. Which scope did you have in mind? Regards, Markus
