On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:27:30 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >>> 2.       Deleting the ingress qdisc fails to remove filters added in
> >>> HW. Filters in SW gets deleted.
> >>>
> >>> We haven’t exactly root-caused this, the changes being extensive, but
> >>> our guess is again something wrong with the offload check or similar
> >>> while unregistering the block callback (tcf_block_cb_unregister) and
> >>> further to the classifier (CLS_U32/CLS_FLOWER etc.) with the
> >>> DESTROY/REMOVE command.  
> >> 
> >> Hmm. How does this worked previously. I mean, do you see change of
> >> behaviour? I'm asking because I don't see how rules added only to HW
> >> could be removed, driver should care of it. Or are you talking about
> >> rules added to both SW and HW?  
> >
> >These are rules added to both SW and HW. Previously all cls_* had
> >ndo_setup_tc calls based on the offload capability.
> >
> >commit 8d26d5636d "net: sched: avoid ndo_setup_tc calls for
> >TC_SETUP_CLS*" removed this bit to work with the new block callback. Is
> >there something similar in the block callback flow while acting on the
> >tcf_proto destroy call initiated when the qdisc is cleared?  
> 
> Yes, it is the same.

FWIW I also see what Amritha and Alex are describing here, for cls_bpf
there are no DESTROYs coming on rmmod or qdisc del.  There is a DESTROY
if I manually remove the filter (or if an ADD with skip_sw fails).

Reply via email to