Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> writes: > On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:30:08 -0400 > Roman Mashak <m...@mojatatu.com> wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Roman Mashak <m...@mojatatu.com> >> --- >> tc/tc_qdisc.c | 10 ++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/tc/tc_qdisc.c b/tc/tc_qdisc.c >> index 1e9d909..493538c 100644 >> --- a/tc/tc_qdisc.c >> +++ b/tc/tc_qdisc.c >> @@ -231,6 +231,16 @@ int print_qdisc(const struct sockaddr_nl *who, >> if (n->nlmsg_type == RTM_DELQDISC) >> fprintf(fp, "deleted "); >> >> + if (n->nlmsg_type == RTM_NEWQDISC && >> + (n->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_CREATE) && >> + (n->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE)) >> + fprintf(fp, "replaced "); >> + >> + if (n->nlmsg_type == RTM_NEWQDISC && >> + (n->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_CREATE) && >> + (n->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL)) >> + fprintf(fp, "added "); >> + >> if (show_raw) >> fprintf(fp, "qdisc %s %x:[%08x] ", >> rta_getattr_str(tb[TCA_KIND]), > > I am not sure about this. We don't do this for monitoring routes or addresses.
However we already do this for other TC components - actions and filters, e.g. print_action() or print_filter().
