On 26/10/17 13:16, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> On 2017/10/26 7:52, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> ...
>> @@ -559,6 +574,7 @@ int br_vlan_add(struct net_bridge *br, u16 vid, u16
>> flags)
>>
>> ASSERT_RTNL();
>>
>> + *changed = false;
>> vg = br_vlan_group(br);
>> vlan = br_vlan_find(vg, vid);
>> if (vlan) {
>> @@ -576,9 +592,12 @@ int br_vlan_add(struct net_bridge *br, u16 vid, u16
>> flags)
>> refcount_inc(&vlan->refcnt);
>> vlan->flags |= BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_BRENTRY;
>> vg->num_vlans++;
>> + *changed = true;
>> }
>> - __vlan_add_flags(vlan, flags);
>> - return 0;
>> + if (__vlan_add_flags(vlan, flags))
>> + *changed = true;
>> +
>> + return ret;
>
> "ret" isn't always initialized here, is it?
>
>
> Toshiaki Makita
Oh, good catch! Right you are, weird that there was no warning even with W=1 as
I always check that before sending a set.
Thanks,
Nik
