From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 07:55:17 -0700

> You might squash this patch with the following one ;)

Indeed.

The whole bit of changing dst->child is a bit tricky because of
the generic layer need to access it just for the dst destroy
case.

I'll think a bit more about how to transform this cleanly, so
thanks for the feedback.

Reply via email to