In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
---
This code was tested by compilation only (GCC 7.2.0 was used).
Please, verify if the actual intention of the code is to fall through.
net/x25/x25_facilities.c | 2 +-
net/x25/x25_in.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/x25/x25_facilities.c b/net/x25/x25_facilities.c
index 997ff7b..ad1734d 100644
--- a/net/x25/x25_facilities.c
+++ b/net/x25/x25_facilities.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ int x25_parse_facilities(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
x25_facilities *facilities,
*vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_REVERSE;
break;
}
-
+ /*fall through */
case X25_FAC_THROUGHPUT:
facilities->throughput = p[1];
*vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_THROUGHPUT;
diff --git a/net/x25/x25_in.c b/net/x25/x25_in.c
index 7ac5009..3c12cae 100644
--- a/net/x25/x25_in.c
+++ b/net/x25/x25_in.c
@@ -345,6 +345,7 @@ static int x25_state4_machine(struct sock *sk, struct
sk_buff *skb, int frametyp
case X25_RESET_REQUEST:
x25_write_internal(sk, X25_RESET_CONFIRMATION);
+ /* fall through */
case X25_RESET_CONFIRMATION: {
x25_stop_timer(sk);
x25->condition = 0x00;
--
2.7.4
