On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 13:48 -0700, Wei Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Meanwhile others sockets may grab more references to (and use) the same
> > aged-out dst.
> >
>
> I don't think other sockets could grab more reference to this dst
> because this dst should already be removed from the fib6 tree.
With the current net-next code, the dst is not removed from the fib
tree while someone else is holding it and dst_check() does not fail
after that the cached dst is aged out. If a socket cache grab a
reference to the CACHE dst, it will not release it untill the next
sernum change, regardless of the dst aging.
> > The commit 1e2ea8ad37be ("ipv6: set dst.obsolete when a cached route
> > has expired") was the solution to the above issue prior to the recent
> > refactor.
> >
>
> I don't really understand how this commit is solving the above issue.
> This commit still only ages out cached route if &rt->dst.__refcnt ==
> 1. So if socket is holding refcnt to this dst and dst_check() is not
> getting called, this cached route still won't get deleted.
Setting obsolete to DST_OBSOLETE_KILL forced whoever was holding the
dst reference to drop it on the next dst_check(), so that refcnt could
go down.
Cheers,
Paolo
