From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>

I tried to hard avoiding a call to rb_first() (via tcp_rtx_queue_head)
in tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue(). But this was probably too bold.

Quoting Yuchung :

We might miss re-arming the RTO if tp->retransmit_skb_hint is not NULL.
This can happen when RACK marks the first packet lost again and resets
tp->retransmit_skb_hint for example (tcp_rack_mark_skb_lost())

Fixes: 75c119afe14f ("tcp: implement rb-tree based retransmit queue")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
Reported-by: Yuchung Cheng <ych...@google.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c |    9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index 
6c74f2a3977876e691e7355045d4a84a98af1e30..53dc1267c85e668d9a6d5d60d24e6101f7a9c56b
 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -2921,7 +2921,7 @@ int tcp_retransmit_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff 
*skb, int segs)
 void tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue(struct sock *sk)
 {
        const struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
-       struct sk_buff *skb, *rtx_head = NULL, *hole = NULL;
+       struct sk_buff *skb, *rtx_head, *hole = NULL;
        struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
        u32 max_segs;
        int mib_idx;
@@ -2929,11 +2929,8 @@ void tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue(struct sock *sk)
        if (!tp->packets_out)
                return;
 
-       skb = tp->retransmit_skb_hint;
-       if (!skb) {
-               rtx_head = tcp_rtx_queue_head(sk);
-               skb = rtx_head;
-       }
+       rtx_head = tcp_rtx_queue_head(sk);
+       skb = tp->retransmit_skb_hint ?: rtx_head;
        max_segs = tcp_tso_segs(sk, tcp_current_mss(sk));
        skb_rbtree_walk_from(skb) {
                __u8 sacked;


Reply via email to