From: Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:04:19 +0200
> Not sure we want to go this way and add "netdev"-handle things into > devlink. Thoughts? I think we should avoid this and keep devlink to it's designed purpose.
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set to devli... Florian Fainelli
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set to d... Roopa Prabhu
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set to d... David Miller
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set... Florian Fainelli
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set... Steve Lin
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set... Jiri Pirko
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set... Michal Kubecek
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set... Roopa Prabhu
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set... Jiri Pirko
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set... Roopa Prabhu
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set to devli... David Miller
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set to devlink David Miller
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set to devlink David Miller
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set to devlink Steve Lin
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set to devlink Roopa Prabhu
