From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 09:40:12 +0200
> The QCA folks found another netlink problem - we were missing validation > of some attributes. It's not super problematic since one can only read a > few bytes beyond the message (and that memory must exist), but here's the > fix for it. > > I thought perhaps we can make nla_parse_nested() require a policy, but > given the two-stage validation/parsing in regular netlink that won't work. > > Please pull and let me know if there's any problem. Yeah, nested parsing is messy validation-wise. Pulled, thanks Johannes.
