On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 01:40:13PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Shmulik Ladkani <shmu...@nsof.io> wrote:
> > From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladk...@gmail.com>
> >
> > Commit 2c16d6033264 ("netfilter: xt_bpf: support ebpf") introduced
> > support for attaching an eBPF object by an fd, with the
> > 'bpf_mt_check_v1' ABI expecting the '.fd' to be specified upon each
> > IPT_SO_SET_REPLACE call.
> >
> > However this breaks subsequent iptables calls:
> >
> > # iptables -A INPUT -m bpf --object-pinned /sys/fs/bpf/xxx -j ACCEPT
> > # iptables -A INPUT -s 5.6.7.8 -j ACCEPT
> > iptables: Invalid argument. Run `dmesg' for more information.
[...]
> >
> > References: [1] https://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=150564724607440&w=2
> > [2] https://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=150575727129880&w=2
> >
> > Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pa...@netfilter.org>
> > Cc: Willem de Bruijn <will...@google.com>
> > Reported-by: Rafael Buchbinder <r...@rbk.ms>
> > Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladk...@gmail.com>
>
> Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <will...@google.com>
Applied, thanks.
