On 10/4/17 6:24 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 09:58:54PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>> mlxsw fails device enslavement for a number of reasons. Use the extack
>> facility to return an error message to the user stating why the enslave
>> is failing.
>>
>> Messages are prefixed with "spectrum" so users know it is a constraint
>> imposed by the hardware driver. For example:
>> $ ip li add br0.11 link br0 type vlan id 11
>> $ ip li set swp11 master br0
>> Error: spectrum: Enslaving a port to a device that already has an upper
>> device is not supported.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <[email protected]>
>
> Great stuff, thanks David!
>
> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]>
>
> See one small nit below, but I would like to patch
> mlxsw_sp_netdevice_port_vlan_event() as well, so I can take care of it
> then.
ok. Works for me. I was planning to add more error messages to mlxsw;
happy to concede that to you or someone else. For example a bridge
without vlan filtering:
$ ip li add br1 type bridge
$ ip li set swp20 master br1
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 46
>> ++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
>> index 3adf237c951a..a6cc00e4e543 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
>> @@ -4019,14 +4019,20 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_lag_index_get(struct mlxsw_sp
>> *mlxsw_sp,
>> static bool
>> mlxsw_sp_master_lag_check(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
>> struct net_device *lag_dev,
>> - struct netdev_lag_upper_info *lag_upper_info)
>> + struct netdev_lag_upper_info *lag_upper_info,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> {
>> u16 lag_id;
>>
>> - if (mlxsw_sp_lag_index_get(mlxsw_sp, lag_dev, &lag_id) != 0)
>> + if (mlxsw_sp_lag_index_get(mlxsw_sp, lag_dev, &lag_id) != 0) {
>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "spectrum: Unknown LAG device");
>
> A more accurate message would be:
> "spectrum: Exceeded number of supported LAG devices"
Right. will update.
>
>> return false;
>> - if (lag_upper_info->tx_type != NETDEV_LAG_TX_TYPE_HASH)
>> + }
>> + if (lag_upper_info->tx_type != NETDEV_LAG_TX_TYPE_HASH) {
>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
>> + "spectrum: LAG device using unsupported Tx
>> type");
>> return false;
>> + }
>> return true;
>> }
