Alexey Kuznetsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> IMO, I believe there is a strong case that can be made for events that >> were caused by non-netlink users such as ioctls that could at least be >> multicast with current->pid. > > Highly not desired.
Agreed. The pid field in the netlink header should be treated as an opaque value. Any attempt to interpret it as the process ID is doomed to failure. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
