On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 19:35:18 -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 02:07:46AM +0000, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Hi Martin!
> >
> > On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:37:53 -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> > > index 33ccc474fb04..252f4bc9eb25 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> > > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ struct bpf_map {
> > > struct work_struct work;
> > > atomic_t usercnt;
> > > struct bpf_map *inner_map_meta;
> > > + u8 name[BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN];
> >
> > Any reason not to use plain char? I was looking at adding names to
> > bpftool and:
> Happy to have early user :)
The newly exposed info is so useful I couldn't resist :)
> It was mostly due to my early idea on treating the name as
> a blob without much char checking, which was then trashed
> but did not reflect that here.
>
> I will make a followup patch later.
Awesome, thanks!
